Customer demo mode
Score, freshness, ICP fit, identity confidence, and action state in one operator queue.
Queue
30
workspace signals
Peak
3
score >= 90
Precision
88%
QA baseline
Cost
$0.0037
per signal
Day 12 of Clay credits running out mid-enrichment. Anyone moved to a flat-rate alternative? Burning $4K/mo on credits and still hitting walls.
Explicit Clay credit burn + flat-rate intent + agency-scale spend. Direct ICP match.
Lead score
98
Evidence
93
Routing
90
Why this lead: The post has urgent timing language and is still inside the decay window.
Show HN: I built a Clay alternative that doesn't bill per credit lookup — flat $400/mo for unlimited enrichment of US b2b records. Looking for honest feedback.
HN founder pitch directly addresses Clay credit-burn ICP. Low intent for buyer but high relevance for switch-target packs.
Lead score
97
Evidence
93
Routing
90
Why this lead: The signal is fresh enough to route before the intent half-life burns down.
First month with Clay: $2,800 spend, 4,200 enriched contacts. Math says $0.66 per record. That's not sustainable for our 12-client agency.
Concrete Clay spend math + agency-scale context + sustainability concern. Strong buyer signal.
Lead score
89
Evidence
93
Routing
90
Why this lead: The signal is fresh enough to route before the intent half-life burns down.
[Phase 4 Reddit stub] Anyone here actually moved off Clay successfully? Burning $3K/mo and still need flat-rate enrichment.
Reddit stub — Clay churn ask. Subject to Reddit Data API approval.
Lead score
88
Evidence
93
Routing
90
Why this lead: The signal is fresh enough to route before the intent half-life burns down.
Watching Clay credits eat half my margin this month. Tried Apollo, hated the data quality. Where do small agencies actually get fresh leads now?
Clay margin pain + Apollo dismissal + open lead-source ask. Strong dual-pack relevance.
Lead score
86
Evidence
93
Routing
90
Why this lead: The signal is fresh enough to route before the intent half-life burns down.
Looking for tooling that does enrichment + intent surface for SaaS founders. Most of the cold-outbound stack is built for agencies, not us.
Adjacent ICP — SaaS founder, not agency. Pack mismatch hurts score.
Lead score
66
Evidence
93
Routing
90
Why this lead: The signal is fresh enough to route before the intent half-life burns down.
Random observation: half the cold-email tools you see on HN are funded by the same VC that funded the previous half.
Industry meta-commentary, no buying intent.
Lead score
43
Evidence
93
Routing
90
Why this lead: The signal is fresh enough to route before the intent half-life burns down.
Imagine paying for a tool that scrapes the same LinkedIn data every other tool already scraped.
Industry trolling, no actionable signal.
Lead score
39
Evidence
93
Routing
90
Why this lead: The signal is fresh enough to route before the intent half-life burns down.