Customer demo mode
Score, freshness, ICP fit, identity confidence, and action state in one operator queue.
Queue
30
workspace signals
Peak
3
score >= 90
Precision
88%
QA baseline
Cost
$0.0037
per signal
Day 12 of Clay credits running out mid-enrichment. Anyone moved to a flat-rate alternative? Burning $4K/mo on credits and still hitting walls.
Explicit Clay credit burn + flat-rate intent + agency-scale spend. Direct ICP match.
Lead score
98
Evidence
93
Routing
90
Why this lead: The post has urgent timing language and is still inside the decay window.
First month with Clay: $2,800 spend, 4,200 enriched contacts. Math says $0.66 per record. That's not sustainable for our 12-client agency.
Concrete Clay spend math + agency-scale context + sustainability concern. Strong buyer signal.
Lead score
89
Evidence
93
Routing
90
Why this lead: The signal is fresh enough to route before the intent half-life burns down.
Watching Clay credits eat half my margin this month. Tried Apollo, hated the data quality. Where do small agencies actually get fresh leads now?
Clay margin pain + Apollo dismissal + open lead-source ask. Strong dual-pack relevance.
Lead score
86
Evidence
93
Routing
90
Why this lead: The signal is fresh enough to route before the intent half-life burns down.
Looking for tooling that does enrichment + intent surface for SaaS founders. Most of the cold-outbound stack is built for agencies, not us.
Adjacent ICP — SaaS founder, not agency. Pack mismatch hurts score.
Lead score
66
Evidence
93
Routing
90
Why this lead: The signal is fresh enough to route before the intent half-life burns down.