Customer demo mode

2 matched signals.

Score, freshness, ICP fit, identity confidence, and action state in one operator queue.

Queue

30

workspace signals

Peak

3

score >= 90

Precision

88%

QA baseline

Cost

$0.0037

per signal

91Peak
marc_hnHNClaydecays to 50 in 42h

Show HN: I built a Clay alternative that doesn't bill per credit lookup — flat $400/mo for unlimited enrichment of US b2b records. Looking for honest feedback.

evaluatingleaving-clay-credit-burnidentity 93%145 employees

HN founder pitch directly addresses Clay credit-burn ICP. Low intent for buyer but high relevance for switch-target packs.

Lead score

97

Evidence

93

Routing

90

Why this lead: The signal is fresh enough to route before the intent half-life burns down.

82Likely
lemlist_userHNLemlistdecays to 50 in 34h

Lemlist is great for solo operators but the moment you scale to 4+ inboxes the personalization spintax engine starts producing garbage. Anyone evaluated alternatives that scale past that wall?

evaluatinglemlist-feature-gapidentity 93%75 employees

Lemlist scale-out feature gap + open evaluation. Mid-strength intent.

Lead score

66

Evidence

93

Routing

90

Why this lead: The signal is fresh enough to route before the intent half-life burns down.